Anyone else wondering why the Old Vic has decided to sell tickets for the live-streamed performances of Lungs in the way it has?
 
Old Vic We'll be back soon sign
 
And by that, I mean pricing tickets and limiting the numbers as if people are actually coming to watch it in the theatre.
 
You don't get a better seat for £65 but you might have to pay that when the cheaper seats sell out.
 
Actors Matt Smith and Claire Foy who star are a big draw and the queues to get on the website have been in the thousands (I joined at 8,000+ and 7 hours later haven't made it onto the site).
 
Surely, given the demand, they could have sold unlimited tickets at a fixed price – say £20 – and made more money on an extremely limited number of performances.
 
It would open up theatre to a broader audience, not just those for whom the ticket prices are mostly prohibitive but also those who live too far away.
 
By adopting this conventional form of ticketing at such an unconventional time it feels like it is just reinforcing theatre's image of being an exclusive pass time for the affluent.
 
Or am I missing something?
 
Posted in ,

2 responses to “Is the Old Vic’s choice of ticketing for Lungs reinforcing what is bad about theatre?”

  1. John Chapman avatar

    Totally agree. They could have made just as much if not more by selling at a cheaper price given that there’s potentially a whole planet to accommodate. It would also have been good PR for the OV and theatre in general and encourage audiences to return once all this is over. I’ve given up too now that theres only top two tiers left. A missed opportunity

  2. Rev Stan avatar

    I agree John, it is an opportunity missed. Such a shame.
    By the time I got to the front of the queue tickets were £55 and I can’t justify spending that at the moment particularly not to sit in my living room and watch my own telly.

Leave a Reply

Discover more from Rev Stan's Theatre Blog

Subscribe now to keep reading and get access to the full archive.

Continue reading