The last time Jamie Lloyd directed James McAvoy in a play, he had him riding around the stage on a unicycle in nothing but his pants.

CyranodeBergerac_Prod_3507x2480

In Cyrano de Bergerac, their latest collaboration, the trousers stay on (sorry) instead it is deep, raw emotional pain which is laid bare for all to see.

It is a tragic tale of unrequited love. Cyrano has gained acclaim and respect as a skilled soldier but is also beloved as a clever wordsmith baiting the authorities with his biting wit and writing beautiful romantic verse with equal aplomb.

Convinced that the woman he loves – Roxane (Anita-Joy Uwajeh) – will never see past his looks he accelerates his own heartache by helping her and her lover Christian (Eben Figueiredo), a good looking cadet.

Fresh approach

Lloyd's modus operandi is to take a fresh approach to classic plays, adding a contemporary spin while drawing out the deeper emotions and nuances and Cyrano is no exception.

The stage is plain and simple with just a mirror or sometimes a couple of chairs.

Cyrano is reborn as a performance poet. While the actors all have head mics, there are two traditional microphones – a reminder of the 'performance', one of several nods to it in the production.

The original play was written in verse and Martin Crimp's free adaptation also utilises verse.

Cleverly written

And, as much I've disliked his work in the past, this is a beautifully and cleverly written; lyrical and poetic yet modern blending rap and an urban edge.

At times Lloyd has the characters in conversation but speaking directly to the audience – another nod to 'performance'. There is no physical interaction, or fellow performer to riff off, neither is there much movement, rather it is stripped back, it is all in their faces and voices.

It wouldn't work if it wasn't for the skill of the actors, in fact, it is done so well that these segments flow naturally within the piece, leaving only the emotional impact.

Intimate performance style

What you get is a more intimate and affecting performance, the actors' faces are exposed directly to the audience often in the most vulnerable and emotionally intense moments.

You can see the joy, the hope, the despair, the agony, the glisten of tears forming in the eyes, a solitary wet track down a cheek.

Lloyd has also chosen not to give Cyrano his trademark nose but that doesn't mean it isn't there looming large over the entire story.

Feel the effect rather than see

You can see it in your mind's eye or rather feel the effect it has on Cyrano's self-esteem.

I once saw James McAvoy walk on stage and perform just one speech from Julius Caesar.

His performance was at times quiet and restrained at others explosive and bursting with energy, so captivating he had the audience laughing, gasping and crying in just the few minutes it took to deliver the speech.

Breathtaking

That intensity of performance is magnified to fill more than two and a half hours in Cyrano and it took my breath away.

It was one of those rare nights at the theatre when you feel like you are watching something really special.

The beauty and rawness of it pull you in and envelopes you and the performances combined with the tragedy of the story haunted me for days.

I already can't wait to see Lloyd and McAvoy do next, I just hope it isn't a four-year wait.

Cyrano de Bergerac is 2 hours and 55 minutes including an interval and I'm giving it ⭐️⭐️⭐️⭐️⭐️.

It's at the Playhouse Theatre until 29 February.

Other Jamie Lloyd/James McAvoy collaborations I've seen:

Review: James McAvoy is certifiably good in The Ruling Classes.

James McAvoy's Macbeth first thoughts

James McAvoy's Macbeth second thoughts

When James McAvoy delivered that speech from Julius Caesar.

 

Posted in

2 responses to “Review: Jamie Lloyd exposes James McAvoy in the raw, emotional treat that is Cyrano de Bergerac”

  1. Anon avatar
    Anon

    I saw this from the upper circle restricted view & have to say it did not work for me at all (& The Ruling Class, thus the Lloyd McAvoy combo was what got me into theatre properly in the first place I was so blown away by that.)
    May I advise just do not buy a ticket in the side sections of the upper circle (possibly front row might be ok but row B was NOT.) I’d have had more fun sat at home staring at the wall for a few hours. You won’t be able to see a thing. It was totally a radio play. It was 100% a waste of money.
    I was so disappointed! I had such high expectations. I am seeing it later in the run from hopefully a slightly better seat, but I can’t feel enthused as I found it a rather dull love story & it made me roll my eyes that the premise is that someone wouldn’t find Cyrano attractive, yet I’m sure there is a large proportion of the audience crushing on actual JM & James speaking romantic words is likely what folk will like most about it!!!?! It’s like opposite world. The premise doesn’t work unless you can empathise with Cyrano’s experience of the world for me. I can’t buy into nobody desiring James & not only due to looks but he’s one in the most charismatic stage actors out there!? It makes no sense. I couldn’t stop thinking how there must be so many incredible actors out there who could do this. And then I felt annoyed as it’s a play from the male perspective & most women would love a man for his mind, but not a woman. Why not subvert the gender for this play in 2019? Or do something more challenging. How about a visibly disabled actor as Cyrano. Only things like that make sense with this play in 2029 to me. It felt pointless as it was to me.
    I don’t know: I can’t judge the performances as I simply could not see them (some people left at the interval, the view was so nonexistent near me) but I did not leave enthused to see the play from a better seat. And if a play doesn’t carry to the (front of) the upper circle, has it truly worked? I wonder. Oh, I loved The Ruling Class so much though!

  2. Rev Stan avatar

    I can completely understand why sitting in the gods and not be able to see much would spoil it. We originally had seats in the upper circle but they were moved by the theatre to the front row of the stalls for ‘sightline issues’.
    Seeing the performances up close – close enough to see tears forming in the actors eyes – was such a treat and definitely enhanced the experience.
    I see where you are coming from with Cyrano’s looks but I actually thought the suggestion of a nose was very powerful, a fake nose would have detracted from the play. In not having ‘the nose’ it could even suggest that Cyrano is overly self-critical, that his ‘bad’ looks are all in his own head.
    For me personally it felt like his large nose was present, even if you couldn’t see it.
    I think a gender swap Cyrano is a brilliant idea, though.
    I really enjoyed the swapping of lines for Titania and Oberon in the Bridge Theatre’s Midsummer Night’s Dream as it added a whole new dimension to a play in which the female characters are generally treated really badly.
    Thanks for taking the time to share your views.

Leave a Reply

Discover more from Rev Stan's Theatre Blog

Subscribe now to keep reading and get access to the full archive.

Continue reading