Theatre is supposed to reflect society, challenge and change but how can it do that when its programming doesn't fully embrace the full gamut of ethnicity, sexual orientation and balance of gender?

Queens_of_Sheba_750x490The Edinburgh Fringe: It was a blast, bonkers, a baptism, friendly, sometimes frantic and lots of fun. But all good things come to an end and since getting home I've had time to reflect on everything I've seen and experienced.

Fringe theatre has always felt like the true stomping ground for more varied and diverse programming and so it is with the Edinburgh Fringe – definitely less white and middle-class-centric.

Audiences were more diverse in age-range too, no sitting in a predominantly middle-aged audience.

Dearth of BAME theatre

But where Edinburgh has a reasonably good offering of female-centric and LGBT theatre it has a dearth of BAME – something that was also reflected in those watching.

One of my Edinburgh housemates and a Fringe regular, @ShakespeareanLK, commented on how white the Fringe still is and she's right.

Two of my favourite plays were Queens of Sheba and The Fishermen (both won much-deserved Fringe awards).


The-fishermen-edinburgh-fringeCurious about the world at large

They were on my list to see because I crave diversity in narrative and story – I'm curious about the world at large, interested in different human experiences not just those of white people and white British people.

Theatre is supposed to reflect society, challenge and change but how can it do that when its programming doesn't fully embrace the full gamut of ethnicity, sexual orientation and balance of gender?

Colour blind casting not enough

I'm not talking about colour blind casting and gender swapping roles, I'm talking about the plays themselves, the stories, the themes, the context.

Does theatre truly reflect British society – gender, ethnicity, class etc. or is there hypocrisy at play?

On the big screen, there has been a swathe of blockbusters exploding the myth that female and black leads don't sell cinema tickets. What is theatreland's excuse?

One of the things I really loved about Edinburgh was its more varied programming but there is still plenty of room for improvement and London could learn some lessons too.

Update: Since writing this Victoria Sadler has published her annual research into the representation of female playwrights in London's major theatres which makes for an interesting – and depressing read.

 

Posted in

2 responses to “Final thoughts on my first trip to the Edinburgh Fringe or lessons in diverse programming”

  1. ian harris avatar

    I have come to the conclusion that Theatre’s only role is the telling of stories. Whether it is a reflection of how (and why) we live is up to the listener/watcher and what goes on on in his or her head. I think we are in danger of asking too much of theatre. In danger of confining it to our day and age. We can so easily forget the old stories, the myths and legends that are as relevant today as they ever were. The scenery may change but the cast (human beings) stay much the same. Old habits die hard.
    (Have I just vanished up my own exhaust pipe?)

  2. Rev Stan avatar

    Hi Ian,
    You make a good point about perhaps asking too much of theatres but the language often used to describe theatre and plays by theatres and theatre makers – suggests a feeling of its importance beyond storytelling.
    But I think that is a separate issue and one that needs further exploring in a another post.
    What I’m suggesting with this piece is that the scope of content – stories if you want – is still too narrow. I’m not suggesting ignore old stories but, for example, where are old stories from a BAME perspective (or female)?
    There are so many plays about white, middle class people, I want to hear from more diverse voices, whether they are from the past or now.

Leave a Reply

Discover more from Rev Stan's Theatre Blog

Subscribe now to keep reading and get access to the full archive.

Continue reading