3902It's raining heavily outside the Old Vic, it's raining inside too.  The stage is obscured by a slate roof onto which rain pours. As the lights go down the roof lifts up and back to reveal a junk-filled, tatty attic room.

There is a bed to one side and a bucket hangs from the ceiling to catch drips. There is one window and rain trickles down the outside. There are voices from the other side of the one door to the room and through it steps a man in a smart grey suit and an old man with wild, wiry grey hair and a tatty old-gent suit.

If you are going to see your first ever production of Harold Pinter's The Caretaker you might as well make it big budget production with actors of the calibre of Timothy Spall, Daniel Mays and George MacKay. First production? Shocking I know, the play has taken on almost mythical qualities because it's a classic I haven't seen. I've not read it either so I'm experiencing the play (and Spall on stage) for the first time.

He plays Davies, a homeless man, whom Aston (Daniel Mays) has rescued from a brawl. Aston lives in the room which is in a house owned by his brother Mick (George MacKay). He's doing it up for him, although he never seems to do much other than try and fix a plug or stare deep in thought. Davies talks without really seeming to say anything of any substance and Aston doesn't say much he just goes about working on the plug.

Mick, when he appears, talks a lot, fast and aggressively but again doesn't say much of any substance. They are all slippery, half-characters, you learn little of their history the irony being that Davies, the most loquacious, is probably the least reliable narrator. He says what he thinks people want to hear allies himself to whomever he thinks will let him stay. It is a tactic that doesn't reckon on family loyalty.


Timothy Spall's performance reminded me a little of Fagin, a little his Harry Potter character Wormtail and occasionally a bit Rik Mayall and I couldn't take my eyes of him. It is a play that allows actors the freedom to perform just as much without dialogue as with it and with Spall, there is always something going on.

Arguably Daniel Mays has the harder job as Aston's behaviour is far more repetitive, seemingly disconnected and yet he makes him an intriguing presence. Of the three he seems the closest to being honest, the irony is that he says the least and yet you feel you know him the best. In his lengthiest bit of dialogue, he tells Davies about something that happened to him as a child which still haunts me. It is the most open he's been – that any of the characters have been – and there is a double cruelty in both the story and the fact that Davies falls asleep and doesn't hear it.

Mick is a burst of energy, speaking with an aggressive rapidity, often jargon designed to disconcert. He is physically aggressive too, attacking Davies when he finds him in his brother's room. When he goes quiet and still his aggression leaves a resonance in the room that hangs in the air waiting to be taken up again.

The Caretaker is a play of subtleties and is one in which you need good actors like this who can flush out the subtext. This is a long production – three hours and 10 minutes including two intervals – its hard work, testing and tiring but it is also rewarding and there is a lot that will stay with me. Performances get five stars but I'm knocking a star off because of the running time and late finish.

You can see The Caretaker at the Old Vic until May 14. Click on this link to go through to the official production photos.

Postscript

* Not sure the production needs to be this long. There are no scene changes, just a few props that are moved around which could easily be done with a lights-down pause. By getting rid of one of the intervals you'd knock a good 15 minutes off the running time bringing it to under three hours. Perhaps Timothy Spall needs an extra break?

* George Mackay is a quietly rising star for me. I've only seen him on stage once in Ah! Wilderness but he's got a rapidly growing portfolio of screen work (loved him in Pride). This year he's in an American TV series produced by JJ Abrams and starring James Franco and a film opposite Viggo Mortensen.

 RS/BW 6DS

Have been terribly lax with this, this year mainly because of time pressures. But this is an easy one as Mr W was in Mojo with Daniel Mays.

Posted in

11 responses to “Review: Timothy Spall in The Caretaker, Old Vic Theatre”

  1. John avatar
    John

    It was dull and boring, badly acted too

  2. Katherine Smith avatar
    Katherine Smith

    It was fantastic with brilliant performances by all three characters. The restricted view seats are cheaper yes but they really are restricted view so you do miss the overall impression and have to treat it like a radio play a lot of the time.

  3. Sally avatar
    Sally

    Gosh, glad not everyone is raving about this dull, plodding play, that has no charisma or charm. I had previously seen Kristin Scott-Thomas in Pinter’s ‘Old Times’ and that was excellent. We discussed leaving at the first interval but decided to try the second half, I drifted off and was thinking of my shopping list so dire was the acting and plot.
    We left after the second half (could not face a third act), and many others follow us. On asking the couple behind us they said a lot of people had left after the first act. I see about 40 west end shows a year and have never left before the end. This was a first! The Old Vic too need to not put in 2 intervals, they did this recently too with ‘Master Builder’.

  4. Rev Stan avatar

    It’s clearly dividing opinions and I’ll be interested to read what the critics make of it. I’ve seen other Pinter plays I would say I prefer (The Hot House for example). I think this would work better as a shorter, perhaps straight through play so the tension builds more quickly. I thought the performances were great, it will be Daniel May’s speech about what happened to him as a child which will stay with me.

  5. Alice avatar
    Alice

    What a condescending review , the assumption that someone would not like it because they had cheaper seats.
    I go to the theatre a lot and I have to agree with sally, dull plodding, badly acted.
    Well done for someone having the guts to point it out.
    The old Vic is awful too, too busy, toilet queues winding their way between people eating in the pokey cafe downstairs.
    It has tired old toilets.
    The amount of money they make, surely it should be nicer or have they spent all the money on big names ?

  6. Dudley avatar
    Dudley

    Hopefully they will judge it properly, not rave because it is the old Vic or fawn over Timothy Spall, just dress him in any costume, same character, blaandings, fungus, the caretaker, same character.
    I await the reviews, but feel quite confident we will see glowing reviews, undeserved.

  7. Rev Stan avatar

    The Old Vic is definitely not one of my favourite theatres, the loos are particularly bad and the sight lines aren’t great even from the stalls. I prefer it when they have the stage in the centre. If I can get a £10 preview ticket (which I did for The Caretaker) I will give it a punt but I don’t think I would pay full price unless it was something I was desperate to see.

  8. Rev Stan avatar

    Hi Dudley, I don’t think I was raving because it was the Old Vic I mentioned that it was a big budget production with the rain machine and set reveal. And Timothy Spall is one of list of actors I’ve wanted to see on stage. Equally I’m a fan of Daniel Mays whom I’ve seen lots of times. Everyone has their own favourites and preferences and what works for them and what doesn’t. I merely reflect my own experiences. I’m keeping my fingers crossed for you that at least one of the critics shares your view.

  9. Daver098@hotmail.com avatar
    Daver098@hotmail.com

    Hi, just back from this evenings ‘performance’. I echo the latter, dull, ponderous, I wanted to just “shout get on with it!”. My wife and I discussed very early on, to leave at the end of the first act, and we did just that. We do go to a great deal of theatre and this is the first time we have left before the end – truly disgraceful, and I cannot understand why there was a need to have 3 acts (other than that given below). The critics need to have a shake up, as their revues are completely scewed, with hard earned money being spent in good faith!…

  10. Sam avatar
    Sam

    Critics seem to fawn over stars in the West end, Spall was atrocious, paint him green and close your eyes and it was fungus the bogeyman. Gemma arterton in Nell Gwyn, another example, terrible, amateurish, pantomime.
    Very odd, almost like you can’t criticise the theatres, the astonishing amounts of money they make per performance, and then they cry, we are poor, give us some money.

  11. Sam avatar
    Sam

    You must have seen something else, maybe something better.
    From where I sat, not in a cheap seat, although it is a cheap nasty theatre,the play was yawningly boring, yawn,yawn , sorry yawn, zzzzzz

Leave a Reply

Discover more from Rev Stan's Theatre Blog

Subscribe now to keep reading and get access to the full archive.

Continue reading