5204485415_46248055ca

Swan Theatre, Stratford upon Avon, credit: Rev Stan

Interesting piece by Lyn Gardner in yesterday's Guardian about whether theatres should be funding audiences not just the artists.

The truth is that it's often pretty easy for theatres to offer development time and scratch performances, where work can be tested on stage; what is often harder is to actually programme the work or help it to tour and find an audience.

Which got me thinking about the relationship between theatres and the audience. I do sometimes think that there is a disconnect between the artistic world and those who put their hands in their pockets and pay for tickets. There have been occasions when I have felt like 'the pesky audience'.
More could definitely be done to engage and even, in some instances,
welcome.

For example, there has been a plethora of playwright-led 'festivals'. The Royal Court even had playwrights 'taking over the theatre' in the summer which had me flippantly imagining playwrights running amok and the audience knocking on the door trying to get let in. Engaging with the audience is a tricky feat – a festival for theatre fans? (Now there is a whole new post about what my fantasy theatre festival would include.)

OK so a festival for theatre fans is perhaps a silly idea but at the very least more theatres should engage with the audience about their experiences. As a regular, it would be nice to feel some faint sort of acknowledgement as to the part we play. (Is now the time to suggest the loyalty card, coffee-shop style?)


Earlier this year Polly Stenham was interviewed about her new play No Quarter by Mark Lawson for Radio 4's Front Row. Lawson had seen a £10 Monday preview (the same night I was there in fact) and dismissed the audience because of the cheap tickets. He seemed to think that those in attendance weren't serious theatre-goers, just people attracted to a bargain and therefore their response was in some way less important.

But Stenham's reply had me yelling 'hallelujah' at the radio.  She said that the £10 Monday audience was probably the most important because it's made up predominantly of regular theatre-goers. Those who spread the word among other regular theatre-goers and occasional theatre-going friends and family. It was comforting to know that there are those in the industry that understand their audience.

Now Lawson is a critic rather than a theatre industry professional but he, in a similar way, is removed from the whole dirty process of exchanging hard-earned cash for tickets.

It's a little bit early for new year's resolutions but I'd like to suggest the audience goes onto to the list for 2014 in a more prominent position than it perhaps has.

Posted in

2 responses to “Theatres vs audience”

  1. Jakeyoh avatar

    What about Theatre Royal Stratford East’s Open Stages in 2012? The theatre was programmed by the audiences that the theatre serves. That sounds very much what you’re getting at.
    I would say that there is a general fear that giving control to audiences will only mean the outcome is popular culture/choices. Musicals, well-known / studied-at-school playwrights, and the likes. Would there be any real innovation, and informed choices of work, or just work that is within the audience’s frame of reference?
    Don’t get me wrong, there are many audience members such as yourself who are greatly informed of what theatre is and can be, you know the highs and lows that theatre can offer, but can the same be said for general audiences? I’m not sure, but that’s partly because I’m not sure we can ever really know.
    An artistic director’s role is to not only serve the theatre industry but to serve the artists the theatre works with, and the theatre’s audiences too. That can mean at times they programme work specifically for their audiences – shows that are likely to meet audience approval and sell – whilst at others times they programme to challenge and introduce their audiences to something new. Try, this might seem a selfish act at times, but I rarely think an artistic director thinks of themselves, it’s just not that easy.
    Some curious thoughts to think on.

  2. Rev Stan avatar

    Didn’t know about the Theatre Royal’s Open stages – how did that work out?
    And yes I completely take your point about audiences potentially choosing what is popular rather than interesting. If a few ‘obsessives’ like ourselves were involved it might be different.
    I suppose the point I was getting at is I don’t think theatres always understand their audiences not just from a programming point of view but also from a practical point of view.

Leave a Reply

Discover more from Rev Stan's Theatre Blog

Subscribe now to keep reading and get access to the full archive.

Continue reading