After%20Miss%20Julie%20by%20Richard%20Huber%20SmithI don't want to let what will now be know as 'the budgie incident' overshadow what is a very good play but I can't but help but obsess with it. You see something bad happens to a budgie. It's hopping around in its cage. It gets removed from its cage and then, well, it's bloody, is all I'll say.

Now I know no real harm comes to the budgie – although there is no official confirmation of this in the programme, just the name of the company that supplies the birds (it says budgies plural). But where does it go, how does the theatre trickery work so that it is safely stowed for the remainder of the play with some cuttlefish or Trill to keep it happy and quiet?

I've asked the Young Vic and they haven't yet replied. Yes I am that obsessed with it but putting it to one side, the play itself is very good.

It's set just after the end of the second world war in the kitchen of an aristocratic household. It's a time of austerity, rationing still in full force. Labour has just swept into power on a landslide, class barriers are starting to break down and so too the perceived role of women.

Julie (Natalie Dormer), the daughter of 'his Lordship' has had a unconventional upbringing. From what she tells us, her mother was a bohemian who was eventually 'brought into line' by her father who appears to have got embarrassed by her behaviour – presumably the behaviour that first attracted him to her.


We learn from the servants that Julie has recently been jilted after an incident involving a horsewhip in the stable. Left at home with a party in full swing and her father in town she is struggling with her sexuality and status.

She flirts with chauffeur John (Kieran Bew) who is the fiance of Christine (Polly Frame) the housekeeper. She abuses her position and would give Freud plenty to mull over wanting both to dominate and be dominated.

Things come to head when John and Julie spend the night together and are discovered by Christine.

Julie is a fascinating character full of inner turmoil and conflicts, she is cruel and vulnerable. And John is similarly conflicted. At first respectful and mindful of his place he succumbs to his animal instincts which ultimately leads him to his own embarrassed cruelty.

It feels like a mini-war is being re-enacted below stairs in the kitchen, the play positively oozes tension as so much that is familiar is starting to break down and lines are crossed and unfamiliar territory provokes ugly reactions.

All three performances are faultless. Dormer knows just how to move and stand to maximise the flirtation without it feeling forced.

I'm going to give After Miss Julie four and a half stars and if anyone can enlighten me about the budgie, I'd be eternally grateful. It runs in the Maria Space of the Young Vic until April 14.

RS/BW 6DS

Natalie Dormer was in the dreadful W.E. which starred the wonderful Andrea Riseborough who was in The Pride with Mr W in New York.

Posted in

3 responses to “Review: After Miss Julie and the budgie murder”

  1. thebudgielives avatar
    thebudgielives

    I agree the budgie murder was utterly convincing and hugely distracting and I spent the last 10 minutes of the play desperate to have my fears disproven. On the way out I asked an usher if it was a real bird and he said “yes – but the same real bird will be on stage again tomorrow night”. Frustratingly though there is no information confirming that on the website or at the venue, with the result that any members of the audience who have the slightest interest in animal welfare are left potentially confused and upset. It would be so easy to avoid that by putting a sign in the door at the start, or by bringing the budgie back on for a curtain call…
    Anyway, this YouTube video shows how it’s done:

  2. Rev Stan avatar

    Since the post and tweet I’ve been in Twitter contact with the feathered performer who very kindly sent me a pic to allay my fears ;0) http://youngviclondon.files.wordpress.com/2012/03/photo.jpg

  3. E Mitril avatar
    E Mitril

    Yes this budgie thing. I sat literally in the front row just behind where the bird cage was placed and directly (about 6 inches) in front of the carving board which led to …splat!!.. three nice goblets of ‘blood’ spurting onto my glasses in a real bullseye performance when the budgie lost his or…her head. Very effective to say the least although I was a bit worried about the cleaning bill if any such gobs had landed on my nice wool jacket. I was utterly convinced and more than a bit nauseous but great theatre. Ho ho as Hunter Thompson used to say…The ushers refused me the opportunity to look under the bload soaked kitchen cloth which doubled as the budgie death shroud covering up the crime and I got the same mildly perverse answer about ‘all part of the magic’. Yes indeed. Well not for the budgie if it were real and yes the real budgie should come out for the encore – brilliant suggestion ! But also a great play and effective all around. All that is except the nausea inducing bit at least if you are in the front row in front of the doomed budgie. Go and enjoy nonetheless.

Leave a Reply

Discover more from Rev Stan's Theatre Blog

Subscribe now to keep reading and get access to the full archive.

Continue reading